Marketing & Management for Private Lavel Brand †Free Sample

Question: Discuss about the Marketing Management for Private Lavel Brand. Answer: Introduction Planter peanut company is an organization that was founded in 1906 and a division ofKraft Foods and has completed a century in the U.S. market in this year. This organization is known for its processednuts and the icon for the organization that is Mr. Peanut is famous. The annual revenue obtained by this organization in the year 2016 until now is $997.2 million that is lower than the private level brand, which earned $1225.5 (Statista 2016). Figure 1: Sales of the nuts brands in the United States in 2016 (Source: Statista 2016) However, this organization is struggling for better productivity and profitability due to their low performance and thus, the principal objective of this assignment is to diagnose the problem along with the analysis of consumer behaviour in the snack nut category so that their performance can be resolved. In addition to that, the marketing research strategy undertaken by the Kraft Foods Group that is different from the Planters Nuts Company which is followed by the Planters Nuts current segmentation, targeting and positioning. Lastly, the assignment wraps up with some recommended strategy regarding brand positioning of the concerned organization so that better productivity can be achieved. Discussion This section comprises of the 5C framework that consists of the company, its customer, competitors, collaborator and context. The context can be welly described through the PEST analysis by depicting the environmental factor about the concerned organization. In addition to that, a factor in consumer behaviour will also be covered in this section along with the current segmentation, targeting and positioning. Application of the 5Cs framework for evaluating the Planters Nuts problem Figure 2: 5C Framework of marketing (Source: Yadav et al. 2013) Company Moradi et al. (2013) depict that even though the organization has gained popularity for their products but they had to struggle for their low margin price. The prime reason for this low margin is the volatile price of the peanuts, which is not declining at an exponential rate but do so at a steady pace over a period. Additionally, Yadav et al. (2013) portray that organization had to struggle after introducing almonds and pistachios and thus suffered from leaky bucket problem due to which they lose customers and market share.It is also evident from the case study that a majority of people prefer almonds to other nuts, as they are a health concern. Figure 3: Customer Perceptions towards Nuts (Source: Planters.com 2016) Thus, from the above statistics, it is evident that expect low-income group; every other group prefers the consumption of almonds compared to any other nuts. Another strategy due to which they are struggling is that they do not spend much on the advertisement. Planters have spent $15.million whereas their competitor Wonderful have to spend $21.4 million (Planters.com 2016). Customer The customers they are targeting for the consumption of the business products are health conscious people and the people who intend to purchase wholesome snacks and favor healthy nuts over processed nuts products (Ruteri and Xu 2013). The problem that they face is that they lose some revenue for almonds and pistachios, who cannot afford those costly products and the high-income group does not prefer to buy tradition peanuts products for which the organization is famous in the community. Moreover, Ngo and O'Cass (2013) portrayed that when the organization takes initiatives for boosting their sales up by manufacturing mixed nuts. The primary reason is to provide customers a chance to purchase every flavour of nuts in one packet, it was a complete failure of their business strategy, as they do not survey for the customers demands and thus have to lose a significant percentage of annual revenue. Competitor Ford and Hkansson (2013) depicts that there are a number of competitors who manufactures snacks products to attract customers with their mouth-watering products. Several processed nut-manufacturing products are strong competitors of the concerned organization Planters Nut Company- Store Brand, Wonderful, Blue Diamond, Emerald and Hampton Farmers. Rothlin and McCann (2016) further demonstrated with the statistical details that the competitor nut origination Wonderful also adopts the strategy for advertising their products. It is also found that Wonderful has 65% more market shares than Planters Nuts in sales of pistachios (Planters.com 2016). Moreover, Mkinen et al. (2013) highlight the details of Store Brand that illustrates that this organization leads market shares in every type of nuts except peanuts and mixed nuts. Figure 4: Market share of Planters and its competitors (Source: Planters.com 2016) Ford and Hkansson (2013) also depicts on the target market of the competitors and it is found from his research that their primary target is especially the women who are 35years and above, secondary target market are the health conscious men and lastly, they also emphasizes on the younger men of age 25 to 34years. On the other hand, Planters only target men and health conscious people. Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2013) also illustrates that Emerald is significant competitors as their products to do business is same that of the Planters. Collaborator They do not have any collaborators as they areis the split industry of the Kraft Food Group. They are sole company that sells confectionary nuts products for satisfying their consumer's needs for the nuts products. Context The best tools that can be used in this context are the PEST analysis that can identify their business macro-environmental factors. Image 5: PEST Analysis (Source: Shabanova et al. 2015) Political issues The political issue that is faced by the organization is the new legislation from the regulating bodies that arise from War or Terror. Shabanova et al. (2015) also depict that apart from the variation in the government rule, US has a stable democratic setup that is fair and transparent with the traders and supplier. The government also emphasizes on the formulation of natural products and agriculture so it can be stated that the political factors have a favorable support. Economic issues In recent time US has its GDP of over $16.760 trillion, which is the largest economy in the world. However, Cullingworth and Caves (2013) portrays that the country is suffering from a budget deficitof $506 million that puts the economic prosperity of the country at the grave. Reeves et al. (2012) hence mentioned that these monetary risks affect the business as the cost of the products rise that is not affordable for low-income people. Social impacts As mentioned above, in the society the health consciousness has become a major concern. Bryman and Bell (2015) portrays that this leads to the lesser sale of the peanuts that is the patent products of the Planters. Moreover, the rate of aged people is increasing at an exponential rate in the US and they are recommended by a doctor not to consume must fatty products like nuts due to their health issues, which affect their annual profit by a significant amount. Technological developments According to the viewpoint of Marshall et al. (2014), the company suffers from technological advancement as in recent times organization mostly emphasizes on the information technology. Moreover, Bashan et al. (2014) depict that, their competitor's techniques can be improved for the growth of the peanuts at a massive amount so that more profitability can be attained that the concerned organization lacks. In addition to that, Verbeke (2013) portrays that the organization also implements technology in packaging procedure that was a plastic bottle in older days and a canned package in recent times. The primary benefits of the canned package are that these products are eco-friendly and store the nuts intact in their nutrients benefits than the plastic bottle. Analysis of consumer behaviour Price The Plants nuts company manufactures nuts products for their consumers. Solomon (2014) demonstrates that the price of the product influence the consumer and the low rate of peanut can be easily affordable to communities. However, the concerned organization took initiatives for selling almonds and pistachios and mixed nuts that cost much higher than the peanuts and hence lower-income group cannot afford the price. Health Benefits According to Solomon et al. (2012), nuts products are rich in fats and are good in tastes; however, they do not have positive aspect always. Thus, from the case studies, it can be depicted that people who are more concern about their health do not prefer these products. Doctors also suggest child and elderly people not to consume more nutty products that may affect the sale of their products. Perception This context can be related to the brand equity of an organization, which signifies that it is more important to value the products and the services rather than the brand name. Planters emphasize on five brand equity measures- quality, relevance, uniqueness, popularity and familiarity. Schiffman et al. (2013) further explain that if consumers get premium quality peanuts every time they made a purchase, they will develop a tendency to buy that product compared to other nut products irrespective of the high price. Moreover, the concerned organization celebrates their 100years in 2016 and hence communities of US are well aware of the brand Planter. Marketing research of Kraft Foods Group Vs Planters Nuts Planters Nuts Company is a division of Kraft Foods Group, which is associated with the grocery products for the North American market. Later they had split to an organization named Mondelz International that deals with the business of the international confectionery and snack brands. Verbeke (2013) illustrates that Kraft Food Group emphasizes on the customary practices like an evaluation of brand health. This approach can be achieved by taking survey directly from the customers and gather information about their brands to increase their productivity. The organization targets their conventional consumers that are the men, who belong to 35 to 65years and the people, who understand the value of the naturally remarkable products (From of the case study). On the other hand, it is found that Planter only focuses on the sale of their products and thus the point of difference is the absence of real nourishments that enhance the consumer's health. They also implement the strategy for selling salted and roasted nuts products that may be mouth-watering in taste but consumption of these products more will result in unnecessary fats. Marketing strategy of Planters Nuts The marketing strategy Planters Nuts can be depicted through the marketing 4p strategy. Figure 6: Marketing Mix Strategy (Source: Balogun et al. 2014) Segmentation There are several products that the concerned organization is formulated under five categories- Nuts and seeds, nut mixes, culinary and limited edition products. In this scenario, also Podolyakina and Popova (2014) presented that nuts and seeds comprise of cashews, peanuts, macadamia nuts, pecans, raw nuts, sunflower seeds and nuts and pistachios. Planters also focus on the mixed nuts products that are dessert-inspired mixes, NUT-rition mixes, nuts and trail mixes (Planters.com 2016). The prime objective is to present a wide variety of nutty products to their loyal customers of every age group and income group. Targeting The organization has their firm existence in the markets of United States; however, the parent organization Kraft Food Group, it is headquartered in Chicago and they are providing their grocery items across the globe. Balogun et al. (2014) depict that they also target the busiest streets of the US so that maximum products can access their stores. They also take initiatives for associating with the local retailer's shops at a different location of the US so that every individual can use their products for a better experience. In addition to that, they have also innovated new products for health conscious customers like cooking oil, walnuts and have nut mixes cans as their limited edition products. Moreover, the strategy of the pricing is to be reasonable so that they can target every group of the community. Danziger et al. (2014) further add that they also follow the strategy of the competitive pricing strategy for surviving in the market. The primary objective of this approach is to provide a choice to the customers so that they can select the best products in their budget. Thus, the concerned organization not only values in their pricing strategies but they will also focus on improving the better quality of the products. Positioning In the year 1998, Plants Nuts Company first introduces the PlantersTrail Mix in a NUTmobile, which is a peanut shaped van that promotes their brands and their products. Later in the year 2004, the icon of the Planters brand earned a spot on Madison Avenues Advertising Walk of Fame. Guo et al. (2013) also adopt another promotional strategy for hosting campaigns and one such example is the Power of the Peanut Campaign. The primary objective for adopting the promotional strategy is to make everyone aware of their products for attaining maximum financial growth of the company. Ellickson et al. (2012) on the other hand further adds that promotions also reveals the implementation of the new products like Dessert-Inspired Mixes are introduces in the 2015 and people now enjoy this product as they came to know about this products through their digital campaign. Recommendation for brand positioning Sirianni et al. (2013) define that brand positioning is a procedure of positioning your brand in the customers perception. It is evident from the case study that Planter Nuts Company has followed their brand equity; however, adopting better branding positioning not only provide a competitive advantage but it also ensures the longevity of the organization. In this section, some brand position strategy is depicted that can be used for overcoming the drawbacks for which the organization is facing difficulty. It is stated by Gammoh et al. (2015) that managing authorities of the concerned organization have to assess the current positioning of the organization. As the organization is a well-renowned organization, so they can implement new and modern technology for achieving their business objective in an efficient way. Moreover, they should also take initiatives for incorporating IT technology like POS devices and online facility so that customer can access their services from anywhere. In addition to that, they can also spend a significant portion of their revenue on the RD department for formulating new ways of improving their products like make peanuts products healthier (Ng and La Blanc). In this way, more customers can purchase their products. In addition to that, implementation of ERP system can also be one of the innovative steps that can enhance the brand position of the concerned organization. This technology is used for performing all the things through digital technology for effe ctive and efficient business procedure. The next step is to identify the direct competitors of the organization and their positive outcome of the business strategies. The leader of Planter Nuts Company can host regular meetings and unofficial gathering where they can formulate theories for better business approach than their competitor and suggests ideas for introducing new and innovative products. Another method is to assess the drawbacks of the companys pitfalls and trying to resolve the difficulty. Customers can get more attracted towards This can be accomplished through a regular survey to their customers about the positive and negative perspective of their products and based on which further assessment can be performed. Moreover, loyal bonus programs can also be implemented so that the customers can get more attracted towards the nut products. Reference List Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E., 2014. Placing strategy discourse in context: Sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), pp.175-201. Bashan, Y., de-Bashan, L.E., Prabhu, S.R. and Hernandez, J.P., 2014. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (19982013). Plant and Soil, 378(1-2), pp.1-33. Bryman, A. and Bell, E., 2015. Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA. Cullingworth, J.B. and Caves, R., 2013. Planning in the USA: policies, issues, and processes. Routledge. Danziger, S., Hadar, L. and Morwitz, V.G., 2014. Retailer pricing strategy and consumer choice under price uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), pp.761-774. Ellickson, P.B., Misra, S. and Nair, H.S., 2012. Repositioning dynamics and pricing strategy. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), pp.750-772. Ford, D. and Hkansson, H., 2013. Competition in business networks.Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), pp.1017-1024. Gammoh, B.S., Koh, A.C. and Okoroafo, S.C., 2015. Global Vs. Local Brand Positioning Strategies: the Moderating Effect Of Belief in Global Citizenship. In Proceedings of the 2010 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 314-314). Springer International Publishing. Guo, X., Ling, L., Dong, Y. and Liang, L., 2013. Cooperation contract in tourism supply chains: The optimal pricing strategy of hotels for cooperative third party strategic websites. Annals of Tourism Research, 41, pp.20-41. Mkinen, S.J., Dedehayir, O., Adner, R., Oxley, J. and Silverman, B.S., 2013. Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems. Marshall, N.A., Dowd, A.M., Fleming, A., Gambley, C., Howden, M., Jakku, E., Larsen, C., Marshall, P.A., Moon, K., Park, S. and Thorburn, P.J., 2014. Transformational capacity in Australian peanut farmers for better climate adaptation. Agronomy for sustainable development, 34(3), pp.583-591. Moradi, M., Aghaie, A. and Hosseini, M., 2013. An agent-based knowledge management framework for marketing-mix decision making. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), 4(3), pp.109-128. Ng, A.Y.H. and La Blanc, S.M., Microsoft Corporation, 2014. POS hardware abstraction. U.S. Patent 8,806,508. Ngo, L.V. and O'Cass, A., 2013. Innovation and business success: The mediating role of customer participation. Journal of Business Research,66(8), pp.1134-1142. Planters.com., 2016. Home | Planters. [online] Available at: https://www.planters.com/ [Accessed 8 Sep. 2016]. Podolyakina, N. and Popova, Y., 2014. Development of Product Promotional Strategy Considering the Risk of Non-demand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, pp.805-811. Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V., 2013. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business Press. Reeves, A., Stuckler, D., McKee, M., Gunnell, D., Chang, S.S. and Basu, S., 2012. Increase in state suicide rates in the USA during economic recession. The Lancet, 380(9856), pp.1813-1814. Rothlin, S. and McCann, D., 2016. Free and Fair Competition in Business. In International Business Ethics (pp. 91-107). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Ruteri, J.M. and Xu, Q., 2013. Consumers Perceptions of Advanced Booking Discount Program Applied on Processed Food Products. Global Journal of Logistics and Business Management, 1, pp.20-27. Schiffman, L., O'Cass, A., Paladino, A. and Carlson, J., 2013. Consumer behaviour. Pearson Higher Education AU. Shabanova, L.B., Ismagilova, G.N., Salimov, L.N. and Akhmadeev, M.G., 2015. PEST-Analysis and SWOT-Analysis as the Most Important Tools to Strengthen the Competitive Advantages of Commercial Enterprises.Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), p.705. Sirianni, N.J., Bitner, M.J., Brown, S.W. and Mandel, N., 2013. Branded service encounters: Strategically aligning employee behavior with the brand positioning. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), pp.108-123. Solomon, M., Russell-Bennett, R. and Previte, J., 2012. Consumer behaviour. Pearson Higher Education AU. Solomon, M.R., 2014. Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: prentice Hall. Statista., 2016. Leading snack nuts brands sales U.S., 2016 | Statistic. [online] Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/189620/top-snack-nut-brands-in-the-united-states/ [Accessed 8 Sep. 2016]. Verbeke, A., 2013. International business strategy. Cambridge University Press. Yadav, M.S., De Valck, K., Hennig-Thurau, T., Hoffman, D.L. and Spann, M., 2013. Social commerce: a contingency framework for assessing marketing potential. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), pp.311-323.